This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Equivalence of two versions of the Axiom of Choice. The proof uses the Axiom of Regularity. The right-hand side is our original ax-ac . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | dfac0 | ⊢ ( CHOICE ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑧 ∀ 𝑤 ( ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ) → ∃ 𝑣 ∀ 𝑢 ( ∃ 𝑡 ( ( 𝑢 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝑢 ∈ 𝑡 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) ↔ 𝑢 = 𝑣 ) ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | dfac7 | ⊢ ( CHOICE ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃! 𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢 ) ) | |
| 2 | aceq0 | ⊢ ( ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃! 𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢 ) ↔ ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑧 ∀ 𝑤 ( ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ) → ∃ 𝑣 ∀ 𝑢 ( ∃ 𝑡 ( ( 𝑢 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝑢 ∈ 𝑡 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) ↔ 𝑢 = 𝑣 ) ) ) | |
| 3 | 2 | albii | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃! 𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢 ) ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑧 ∀ 𝑤 ( ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ) → ∃ 𝑣 ∀ 𝑢 ( ∃ 𝑡 ( ( 𝑢 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝑢 ∈ 𝑡 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) ↔ 𝑢 = 𝑣 ) ) ) |
| 4 | 1 3 | bitri | ⊢ ( CHOICE ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑧 ∀ 𝑤 ( ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ) → ∃ 𝑣 ∀ 𝑢 ( ∃ 𝑡 ( ( 𝑢 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝑢 ∈ 𝑡 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) ↔ 𝑢 = 𝑣 ) ) ) |