This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Define the well-founded relation predicate. Definition 6.24(1) of TakeutiZaring p. 30. For alternate definitions, see dffr2 and dffr3 . A class is called well-founded when the membership relation _E (see df-eprel ) is well-founded on it, that is, A is well-founded if _E Fr A (some sources request that the membership relation be well-founded on its transitive closure). (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | df-fr | ⊢ ( 𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ( ( 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅ ) → ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧 𝑅 𝑦 ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | cR | ⊢ 𝑅 | |
| 1 | cA | ⊢ 𝐴 | |
| 2 | 1 0 | wfr | ⊢ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴 |
| 3 | vx | ⊢ 𝑥 | |
| 4 | 3 | cv | ⊢ 𝑥 |
| 5 | 4 1 | wss | ⊢ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 |
| 6 | c0 | ⊢ ∅ | |
| 7 | 4 6 | wne | ⊢ 𝑥 ≠ ∅ |
| 8 | 5 7 | wa | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅ ) |
| 9 | vy | ⊢ 𝑦 | |
| 10 | vz | ⊢ 𝑧 | |
| 11 | 10 | cv | ⊢ 𝑧 |
| 12 | 9 | cv | ⊢ 𝑦 |
| 13 | 11 12 0 | wbr | ⊢ 𝑧 𝑅 𝑦 |
| 14 | 13 | wn | ⊢ ¬ 𝑧 𝑅 𝑦 |
| 15 | 14 10 4 | wral | ⊢ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧 𝑅 𝑦 |
| 16 | 15 9 4 | wrex | ⊢ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧 𝑅 𝑦 |
| 17 | 8 16 | wi | ⊢ ( ( 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅ ) → ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧 𝑅 𝑦 ) |
| 18 | 17 3 | wal | ⊢ ∀ 𝑥 ( ( 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅ ) → ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧 𝑅 𝑦 ) |
| 19 | 2 18 | wb | ⊢ ( 𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ( ( 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅ ) → ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧 𝑅 𝑦 ) ) |