This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: The Hilbert lattice satisfies the exchange axiom. Proposition 1(iii) of Kalmbach p. 140 and its converse. Originally proved by Garrett Birkhoff in 1933. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004) (New usage is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotheses | chpssat.1 | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ | |
| chpssat.2 | ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ | ||
| Assertion | cvexchi | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵 ) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ ( 𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵 ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | chpssat.1 | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ | |
| 2 | chpssat.2 | ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ | |
| 3 | 1 2 | cvexchlem | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵 ) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⋖ℋ ( 𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵 ) ) |
| 4 | 2 | choccli | ⊢ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ∈ Cℋ |
| 5 | 1 | choccli | ⊢ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) ∈ Cℋ |
| 6 | 4 5 | cvexchlem | ⊢ ( ( ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) ) ⋖ℋ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) → ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ⋖ℋ ( ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ∨ℋ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) ) ) |
| 7 | 1 2 | chdmj1i | ⊢ ( ⊥ ‘ ( 𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵 ) ) = ( ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ) |
| 8 | incom | ⊢ ( ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ) = ( ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) ) | |
| 9 | 7 8 | eqtri | ⊢ ( ⊥ ‘ ( 𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵 ) ) = ( ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) ) |
| 10 | 9 | breq1i | ⊢ ( ( ⊥ ‘ ( 𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵 ) ) ⋖ℋ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) ↔ ( ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) ) ⋖ℋ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) ) |
| 11 | 1 2 | chdmm1i | ⊢ ( ⊥ ‘ ( 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵 ) ) = ( ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) ∨ℋ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ) |
| 12 | 5 4 | chjcomi | ⊢ ( ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) ∨ℋ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ) = ( ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ∨ℋ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) ) |
| 13 | 11 12 | eqtri | ⊢ ( ⊥ ‘ ( 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵 ) ) = ( ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ∨ℋ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) ) |
| 14 | 13 | breq2i | ⊢ ( ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ⋖ℋ ( ⊥ ‘ ( 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵 ) ) ↔ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ⋖ℋ ( ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ∨ℋ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) ) ) |
| 15 | 6 10 14 | 3imtr4i | ⊢ ( ( ⊥ ‘ ( 𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵 ) ) ⋖ℋ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) → ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ⋖ℋ ( ⊥ ‘ ( 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵 ) ) ) |
| 16 | 1 2 | chjcli | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵 ) ∈ Cℋ |
| 17 | cvcon3 | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ ( 𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵 ) ∈ Cℋ ) → ( 𝐴 ⋖ℋ ( 𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵 ) ↔ ( ⊥ ‘ ( 𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵 ) ) ⋖ℋ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) ) ) | |
| 18 | 1 16 17 | mp2an | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⋖ℋ ( 𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵 ) ↔ ( ⊥ ‘ ( 𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵 ) ) ⋖ℋ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐴 ) ) |
| 19 | 1 2 | chincli | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵 ) ∈ Cℋ |
| 20 | cvcon3 | ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵 ) ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → ( ( 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵 ) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ⋖ℋ ( ⊥ ‘ ( 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵 ) ) ) ) | |
| 21 | 19 2 20 | mp2an | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵 ) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘ 𝐵 ) ⋖ℋ ( ⊥ ‘ ( 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵 ) ) ) |
| 22 | 15 18 21 | 3imtr4i | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⋖ℋ ( 𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵 ) → ( 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵 ) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ) |
| 23 | 3 22 | impbii | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵 ) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ ( 𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵 ) ) |