This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Associative law for the biconditional. An axiom of system DS in Vladimir Lifschitz, "On calculational proofs", Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 113:207-224, 2002, http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/ai-lab/pub-view.php?PubID=26805 . Interestingly, this law was not included inPrincipia Mathematica but was apparently first noted by Jan Lukasiewicz circa 1923. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2005) (Proof shortened by Juha Arpiainen, 19-Jan-2006) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Sep-2013)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | biass | ⊢ ( ( ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) ↔ 𝜒 ) ↔ ( 𝜑 ↔ ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pm5.501 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 ↔ ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) ) ) | |
| 2 | 1 | bibi1d | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) ↔ ( ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) ↔ 𝜒 ) ) ) |
| 3 | pm5.501 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) ↔ ( 𝜑 ↔ ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) ) ) ) | |
| 4 | 2 3 | bitr3d | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) ↔ 𝜒 ) ↔ ( 𝜑 ↔ ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) ) ) ) |
| 5 | nbbn | ⊢ ( ( ¬ 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) ↔ ¬ ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) ) | |
| 6 | nbn2 | ⊢ ( ¬ 𝜑 → ( ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) ) ) | |
| 7 | 6 | bibi1d | ⊢ ( ¬ 𝜑 → ( ( ¬ 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) ↔ ( ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) ↔ 𝜒 ) ) ) |
| 8 | 5 7 | bitr3id | ⊢ ( ¬ 𝜑 → ( ¬ ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) ↔ ( ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) ↔ 𝜒 ) ) ) |
| 9 | nbn2 | ⊢ ( ¬ 𝜑 → ( ¬ ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) ↔ ( 𝜑 ↔ ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) ) ) ) | |
| 10 | 8 9 | bitr3d | ⊢ ( ¬ 𝜑 → ( ( ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) ↔ 𝜒 ) ↔ ( 𝜑 ↔ ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) ) ) ) |
| 11 | 4 10 | pm2.61i | ⊢ ( ( ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) ↔ 𝜒 ) ↔ ( 𝜑 ↔ ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) ) ) |