This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Addition to zero. Remark in proof of Theorem 4K(2) of Enderton p. 81. Note: In this and later theorems, we deliberately avoid the more general ordinal versions of these theorems (in this case oa0r ) so that we can avoid ax-rep , which is not needed for finite recursive definitions. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | nna0r | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ ω → ( ∅ +o 𝐴 ) = 𝐴 ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | oveq2 | ⊢ ( 𝑥 = ∅ → ( ∅ +o 𝑥 ) = ( ∅ +o ∅ ) ) | |
| 2 | id | ⊢ ( 𝑥 = ∅ → 𝑥 = ∅ ) | |
| 3 | 1 2 | eqeq12d | ⊢ ( 𝑥 = ∅ → ( ( ∅ +o 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ↔ ( ∅ +o ∅ ) = ∅ ) ) |
| 4 | oveq2 | ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( ∅ +o 𝑥 ) = ( ∅ +o 𝑦 ) ) | |
| 5 | id | ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦 ) | |
| 6 | 4 5 | eqeq12d | ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( ( ∅ +o 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ↔ ( ∅ +o 𝑦 ) = 𝑦 ) ) |
| 7 | oveq2 | ⊢ ( 𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ( ∅ +o 𝑥 ) = ( ∅ +o suc 𝑦 ) ) | |
| 8 | id | ⊢ ( 𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → 𝑥 = suc 𝑦 ) | |
| 9 | 7 8 | eqeq12d | ⊢ ( 𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ( ( ∅ +o 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ↔ ( ∅ +o suc 𝑦 ) = suc 𝑦 ) ) |
| 10 | oveq2 | ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( ∅ +o 𝑥 ) = ( ∅ +o 𝐴 ) ) | |
| 11 | id | ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴 ) | |
| 12 | 10 11 | eqeq12d | ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( ( ∅ +o 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ↔ ( ∅ +o 𝐴 ) = 𝐴 ) ) |
| 13 | 0elon | ⊢ ∅ ∈ On | |
| 14 | oa0 | ⊢ ( ∅ ∈ On → ( ∅ +o ∅ ) = ∅ ) | |
| 15 | 13 14 | ax-mp | ⊢ ( ∅ +o ∅ ) = ∅ |
| 16 | peano1 | ⊢ ∅ ∈ ω | |
| 17 | nnasuc | ⊢ ( ( ∅ ∈ ω ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ω ) → ( ∅ +o suc 𝑦 ) = suc ( ∅ +o 𝑦 ) ) | |
| 18 | 16 17 | mpan | ⊢ ( 𝑦 ∈ ω → ( ∅ +o suc 𝑦 ) = suc ( ∅ +o 𝑦 ) ) |
| 19 | suceq | ⊢ ( ( ∅ +o 𝑦 ) = 𝑦 → suc ( ∅ +o 𝑦 ) = suc 𝑦 ) | |
| 20 | 19 | eqeq2d | ⊢ ( ( ∅ +o 𝑦 ) = 𝑦 → ( ( ∅ +o suc 𝑦 ) = suc ( ∅ +o 𝑦 ) ↔ ( ∅ +o suc 𝑦 ) = suc 𝑦 ) ) |
| 21 | 18 20 | syl5ibcom | ⊢ ( 𝑦 ∈ ω → ( ( ∅ +o 𝑦 ) = 𝑦 → ( ∅ +o suc 𝑦 ) = suc 𝑦 ) ) |
| 22 | 3 6 9 12 15 21 | finds | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ ω → ( ∅ +o 𝐴 ) = 𝐴 ) |