This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: A more general version of the axiom scheme of separation ax-sep , where variable z can also occur (in addition to x ) in formula ph , which can therefore be thought of as ph ( x , z ) . This version is derived from the more restrictive ax-sep with no additional set theory axioms. Note that it was also derived from ax-rep but without ax-sep as axsepgfromrep . (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2006) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2016) Remove dependency on ax-12 and ax-13 and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 6-Oct-2019)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | axsepg | ⊢ ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | elequ2 | ⊢ ( 𝑤 = 𝑧 → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ) ) | |
| 2 | 1 | anbi1d | ⊢ ( 𝑤 = 𝑧 → ( ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑 ) ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ) |
| 3 | 2 | bibi2d | ⊢ ( 𝑤 = 𝑧 → ( ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ) ) |
| 4 | 3 | albidv | ⊢ ( 𝑤 = 𝑧 → ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ) ) |
| 5 | 4 | exbidv | ⊢ ( 𝑤 = 𝑧 → ( ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ↔ ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ) ) |
| 6 | ax-sep | ⊢ ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) | |
| 7 | 5 6 | chvarvv | ⊢ ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) |