This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Alternate proof of tfr2 using well-ordered recursion. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Aug-2020) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypothesis | tfrALT.1 | ⊢ 𝐹 = recs ( 𝐺 ) | |
| Assertion | tfr2ALT | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ On → ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝐴 ) = ( 𝐺 ‘ ( 𝐹 ↾ 𝐴 ) ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | tfrALT.1 | ⊢ 𝐹 = recs ( 𝐺 ) | |
| 2 | epweon | ⊢ E We On | |
| 3 | epse | ⊢ E Se On | |
| 4 | df-recs | ⊢ recs ( 𝐺 ) = wrecs ( E , On , 𝐺 ) | |
| 5 | 1 4 | eqtri | ⊢ 𝐹 = wrecs ( E , On , 𝐺 ) |
| 6 | 5 | wfr2 | ⊢ ( ( ( E We On ∧ E Se On ) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ On ) → ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝐴 ) = ( 𝐺 ‘ ( 𝐹 ↾ Pred ( E , On , 𝐴 ) ) ) ) |
| 7 | 2 3 6 | mpanl12 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ On → ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝐴 ) = ( 𝐺 ‘ ( 𝐹 ↾ Pred ( E , On , 𝐴 ) ) ) ) |
| 8 | predon | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ On → Pred ( E , On , 𝐴 ) = 𝐴 ) | |
| 9 | 8 | reseq2d | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ On → ( 𝐹 ↾ Pred ( E , On , 𝐴 ) ) = ( 𝐹 ↾ 𝐴 ) ) |
| 10 | 9 | fveq2d | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ On → ( 𝐺 ‘ ( 𝐹 ↾ Pred ( E , On , 𝐴 ) ) ) = ( 𝐺 ‘ ( 𝐹 ↾ 𝐴 ) ) ) |
| 11 | 7 10 | eqtrd | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ On → ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝐴 ) = ( 𝐺 ‘ ( 𝐹 ↾ 𝐴 ) ) ) |