This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Existential introduction, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of Tarski p. 70. See spimew and spimevw for weaker versions requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Mar-2018) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 . Use spimefv instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotheses | spime.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜑 | |
| spime.2 | ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ) | ||
| Assertion | spime | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑥 𝜓 ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | spime.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜑 | |
| 2 | spime.2 | ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ) | |
| 3 | 1 | a1i | ⊢ ( ⊤ → Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜑 ) |
| 4 | 3 2 | spimed | ⊢ ( ⊤ → ( 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑥 𝜓 ) ) |
| 5 | 4 | mptru | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑥 𝜓 ) |