This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Existential introduction, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of Tarski p. 70. See spimew and spimevw for weaker versions requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Mar-2018) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 . Use spimefv instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotheses | spime.1 | |- F/ x ph |
|
| spime.2 | |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ps ) ) |
||
| Assertion | spime | |- ( ph -> E. x ps ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | spime.1 | |- F/ x ph |
|
| 2 | spime.2 | |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ps ) ) |
|
| 3 | 1 | a1i | |- ( T. -> F/ x ph ) |
| 4 | 3 2 | spimed | |- ( T. -> ( ph -> E. x ps ) ) |
| 5 | 4 | mptru | |- ( ph -> E. x ps ) |