This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: A lemma for variants of the axiom of replacement: if we can form the set of images of the functional relation, then we can also form a set containing all its images. The converse requires the axiom of separation. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Apr-2026)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | replem | ⊢ ( ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 ∧ ∃ 𝑤 ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ↔ ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 𝜑 ) ) → ∃ 𝑤 ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑 ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | biimpr | ⊢ ( ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ↔ ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 𝜑 ) → ( ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 𝜑 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ) ) | |
| 2 | r19.23v | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ( 𝜑 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ) ↔ ( ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 𝜑 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ) ) | |
| 3 | 2 | biimpri | ⊢ ( ( ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 𝜑 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ) → ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ( 𝜑 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ) ) |
| 4 | ancr | ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ) → ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ) | |
| 5 | 4 | ralimi | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ( 𝜑 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ) → ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ) |
| 6 | 1 3 5 | 3syl | ⊢ ( ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ↔ ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 𝜑 ) → ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ) |
| 7 | 6 | alimi | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ↔ ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 𝜑 ) → ∀ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ) |
| 8 | ralcom4 | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ↔ ∀ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ) | |
| 9 | 8 | biimpri | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) → ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ) |
| 10 | exim | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) → ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑦 ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ) | |
| 11 | df-rex | ⊢ ( ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑 ↔ ∃ 𝑦 ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) | |
| 12 | 10 11 | imbitrrdi | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) → ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑 ) ) |
| 13 | 12 | ralimi | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) → ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑 ) ) |
| 14 | 7 9 13 | 3syl | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ↔ ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 𝜑 ) → ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑 ) ) |
| 15 | pm2.27 | ⊢ ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → ( ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑 ) → ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑 ) ) | |
| 16 | 15 | ral2imi | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑 ) → ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑 ) ) |
| 17 | 14 16 | syl5 | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → ( ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ↔ ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 𝜑 ) → ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑 ) ) |
| 18 | 17 | eximdv | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → ( ∃ 𝑤 ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ↔ ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 𝜑 ) → ∃ 𝑤 ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑 ) ) |
| 19 | 18 | imp | ⊢ ( ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 ∧ ∃ 𝑤 ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ↔ ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 𝜑 ) ) → ∃ 𝑤 ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑 ) |