This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Weak version of ax-10 from which we can prove any ax-10 instance not involving wff variables or bundling. Uses only Tarski's FOL axiom schemes. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2017) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Feb-2018)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotheses | hbn1fw.1 | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ) | |
| hbn1fw.2 | ⊢ ( ¬ 𝜓 → ∀ 𝑥 ¬ 𝜓 ) | ||
| hbn1fw.3 | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑦 𝜓 → ∀ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑦 𝜓 ) | ||
| hbn1fw.4 | ⊢ ( ¬ 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑦 ¬ 𝜑 ) | ||
| hbn1fw.5 | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀ 𝑦 𝜓 → ∀ 𝑥 ¬ ∀ 𝑦 𝜓 ) | ||
| hbn1fw.6 | ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) ) | ||
| Assertion | hbn1fw | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | hbn1fw.1 | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ) | |
| 2 | hbn1fw.2 | ⊢ ( ¬ 𝜓 → ∀ 𝑥 ¬ 𝜓 ) | |
| 3 | hbn1fw.3 | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑦 𝜓 → ∀ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑦 𝜓 ) | |
| 4 | hbn1fw.4 | ⊢ ( ¬ 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑦 ¬ 𝜑 ) | |
| 5 | hbn1fw.5 | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀ 𝑦 𝜓 → ∀ 𝑥 ¬ ∀ 𝑦 𝜓 ) | |
| 6 | hbn1fw.6 | ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) ) | |
| 7 | 1 2 3 4 6 | cbvalw | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ↔ ∀ 𝑦 𝜓 ) |
| 8 | 7 | notbii | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀ 𝑦 𝜓 ) |
| 9 | 8 5 | hbxfrbi | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ) |