This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Part of proof of Lemma G of Crawley p. 116, sixth line of third paragraph on p. 117: there is "a translation h, different from the identity, such that tr h =/= tr f." (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2013)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotheses | cdlemftr.b | ⊢ 𝐵 = ( Base ‘ 𝐾 ) | |
| cdlemftr.h | ⊢ 𝐻 = ( LHyp ‘ 𝐾 ) | ||
| cdlemftr.t | ⊢ 𝑇 = ( ( LTrn ‘ 𝐾 ) ‘ 𝑊 ) | ||
| cdlemftr.r | ⊢ 𝑅 = ( ( trL ‘ 𝐾 ) ‘ 𝑊 ) | ||
| Assertion | cdlemftr1 | ⊢ ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) → ∃ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 ( 𝑓 ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵 ) ∧ ( 𝑅 ‘ 𝑓 ) ≠ 𝑋 ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | cdlemftr.b | ⊢ 𝐵 = ( Base ‘ 𝐾 ) | |
| 2 | cdlemftr.h | ⊢ 𝐻 = ( LHyp ‘ 𝐾 ) | |
| 3 | cdlemftr.t | ⊢ 𝑇 = ( ( LTrn ‘ 𝐾 ) ‘ 𝑊 ) | |
| 4 | cdlemftr.r | ⊢ 𝑅 = ( ( trL ‘ 𝐾 ) ‘ 𝑊 ) | |
| 5 | 1 2 3 4 | cdlemftr2 | ⊢ ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) → ∃ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 ( 𝑓 ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵 ) ∧ ( 𝑅 ‘ 𝑓 ) ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ( 𝑅 ‘ 𝑓 ) ≠ 𝑋 ) ) |
| 6 | 3simpa | ⊢ ( ( 𝑓 ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵 ) ∧ ( 𝑅 ‘ 𝑓 ) ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ( 𝑅 ‘ 𝑓 ) ≠ 𝑋 ) → ( 𝑓 ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵 ) ∧ ( 𝑅 ‘ 𝑓 ) ≠ 𝑋 ) ) | |
| 7 | 6 | reximi | ⊢ ( ∃ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 ( 𝑓 ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵 ) ∧ ( 𝑅 ‘ 𝑓 ) ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ( 𝑅 ‘ 𝑓 ) ≠ 𝑋 ) → ∃ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 ( 𝑓 ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵 ) ∧ ( 𝑅 ‘ 𝑓 ) ≠ 𝑋 ) ) |
| 8 | 5 7 | syl | ⊢ ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) → ∃ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 ( 𝑓 ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵 ) ∧ ( 𝑅 ‘ 𝑓 ) ≠ 𝑋 ) ) |