This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Part of proof of Lemma G of Crawley p. 116, sixth line of third paragraph on p. 117: there is "a translation h, different from the identity, such that tr h =/= tr f." (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2013)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotheses | cdlemftr.b | |- B = ( Base ` K ) |
|
| cdlemftr.h | |- H = ( LHyp ` K ) |
||
| cdlemftr.t | |- T = ( ( LTrn ` K ) ` W ) |
||
| cdlemftr.r | |- R = ( ( trL ` K ) ` W ) |
||
| Assertion | cdlemftr1 | |- ( ( K e. HL /\ W e. H ) -> E. f e. T ( f =/= ( _I |` B ) /\ ( R ` f ) =/= X ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | cdlemftr.b | |- B = ( Base ` K ) |
|
| 2 | cdlemftr.h | |- H = ( LHyp ` K ) |
|
| 3 | cdlemftr.t | |- T = ( ( LTrn ` K ) ` W ) |
|
| 4 | cdlemftr.r | |- R = ( ( trL ` K ) ` W ) |
|
| 5 | 1 2 3 4 | cdlemftr2 | |- ( ( K e. HL /\ W e. H ) -> E. f e. T ( f =/= ( _I |` B ) /\ ( R ` f ) =/= X /\ ( R ` f ) =/= X ) ) |
| 6 | 3simpa | |- ( ( f =/= ( _I |` B ) /\ ( R ` f ) =/= X /\ ( R ` f ) =/= X ) -> ( f =/= ( _I |` B ) /\ ( R ` f ) =/= X ) ) |
|
| 7 | 6 | reximi | |- ( E. f e. T ( f =/= ( _I |` B ) /\ ( R ` f ) =/= X /\ ( R ` f ) =/= X ) -> E. f e. T ( f =/= ( _I |` B ) /\ ( R ` f ) =/= X ) ) |
| 8 | 5 7 | syl | |- ( ( K e. HL /\ W e. H ) -> E. f e. T ( f =/= ( _I |` B ) /\ ( R ` f ) =/= X ) ) |