This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: A "distinctor elimination" lemma with no disjoint variable conditions on variables in the consequent, proved without using ax-c16 . Version of aev using ax-c11 . (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2006) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | aev-o | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀ 𝑧 𝑤 = 𝑣 ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | hbae-o | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀ 𝑧 ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ) | |
| 2 | hbae-o | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀ 𝑡 ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ) | |
| 3 | ax7 | ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑡 → ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑡 = 𝑦 ) ) | |
| 4 | 3 | spimvw | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑡 = 𝑦 ) |
| 5 | 2 4 | alrimih | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀ 𝑡 𝑡 = 𝑦 ) |
| 6 | ax7 | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑢 → ( 𝑦 = 𝑡 → 𝑢 = 𝑡 ) ) | |
| 7 | equcomi | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑡 → 𝑡 = 𝑢 ) | |
| 8 | 6 7 | syl6 | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑢 → ( 𝑦 = 𝑡 → 𝑡 = 𝑢 ) ) |
| 9 | 8 | spimvw | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑡 → 𝑡 = 𝑢 ) |
| 10 | 9 | aecoms-o | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑡 𝑡 = 𝑦 → 𝑡 = 𝑢 ) |
| 11 | 10 | axc4i-o | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑡 𝑡 = 𝑦 → ∀ 𝑡 𝑡 = 𝑢 ) |
| 12 | hbae-o | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑡 𝑡 = 𝑢 → ∀ 𝑣 ∀ 𝑡 𝑡 = 𝑢 ) | |
| 13 | ax7 | ⊢ ( 𝑡 = 𝑣 → ( 𝑡 = 𝑢 → 𝑣 = 𝑢 ) ) | |
| 14 | 13 | spimvw | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑡 𝑡 = 𝑢 → 𝑣 = 𝑢 ) |
| 15 | 12 14 | alrimih | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑡 𝑡 = 𝑢 → ∀ 𝑣 𝑣 = 𝑢 ) |
| 16 | aecom-o | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑣 𝑣 = 𝑢 → ∀ 𝑢 𝑢 = 𝑣 ) | |
| 17 | 11 15 16 | 3syl | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑡 𝑡 = 𝑦 → ∀ 𝑢 𝑢 = 𝑣 ) |
| 18 | ax7 | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑤 → ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 → 𝑤 = 𝑣 ) ) | |
| 19 | 18 | spimvw | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑢 𝑢 = 𝑣 → 𝑤 = 𝑣 ) |
| 20 | 5 17 19 | 3syl | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑤 = 𝑣 ) |
| 21 | 1 20 | alrimih | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀ 𝑧 𝑤 = 𝑣 ) |