This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Substituting y for x and then z for y is equivalent to substituting z for both x and y . Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 . For a version requiring a disjoint variable, but fewer axioms, see sbcom3vv . (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 8-Apr-2018) Remove dependency on ax-11 . (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 16-Sep-2018) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Sep-2018) (New usage is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | sbcom3 | |- ( [ z / y ] [ y / x ] ph <-> [ z / y ] [ z / x ] ph ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | nfa1 | |- F/ y A. y y = z |
|
| 2 | drsb2 | |- ( A. y y = z -> ( [ y / x ] ph <-> [ z / x ] ph ) ) |
|
| 3 | 1 2 | sbbid | |- ( A. y y = z -> ( [ z / y ] [ y / x ] ph <-> [ z / y ] [ z / x ] ph ) ) |
| 4 | sb4b | |- ( -. A. y y = z -> ( [ z / y ] [ y / x ] ph <-> A. y ( y = z -> [ y / x ] ph ) ) ) |
|
| 5 | sbequ | |- ( y = z -> ( [ y / x ] ph <-> [ z / x ] ph ) ) |
|
| 6 | 5 | pm5.74i | |- ( ( y = z -> [ y / x ] ph ) <-> ( y = z -> [ z / x ] ph ) ) |
| 7 | 6 | albii | |- ( A. y ( y = z -> [ y / x ] ph ) <-> A. y ( y = z -> [ z / x ] ph ) ) |
| 8 | 4 7 | bitrdi | |- ( -. A. y y = z -> ( [ z / y ] [ y / x ] ph <-> A. y ( y = z -> [ z / x ] ph ) ) ) |
| 9 | sb4b | |- ( -. A. y y = z -> ( [ z / y ] [ z / x ] ph <-> A. y ( y = z -> [ z / x ] ph ) ) ) |
|
| 10 | 8 9 | bitr4d | |- ( -. A. y y = z -> ( [ z / y ] [ y / x ] ph <-> [ z / y ] [ z / x ] ph ) ) |
| 11 | 3 10 | pm2.61i | |- ( [ z / y ] [ y / x ] ph <-> [ z / y ] [ z / x ] ph ) |