This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Eliminate an antecedent implied by each side of a biconditional, deduction version. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2012) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Oct-2013)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotheses | pm5.21ndd.1 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜒 → 𝜓 ) ) | |
| pm5.21ndd.2 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜃 → 𝜓 ) ) | ||
| pm5.21ndd.3 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 → ( 𝜒 ↔ 𝜃 ) ) ) | ||
| Assertion | pm5.21ndd | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜒 ↔ 𝜃 ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pm5.21ndd.1 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜒 → 𝜓 ) ) | |
| 2 | pm5.21ndd.2 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜃 → 𝜓 ) ) | |
| 3 | pm5.21ndd.3 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 → ( 𝜒 ↔ 𝜃 ) ) ) | |
| 4 | 1 | con3d | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒 ) ) |
| 5 | 2 | con3d | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜃 ) ) |
| 6 | pm5.21im | ⊢ ( ¬ 𝜒 → ( ¬ 𝜃 → ( 𝜒 ↔ 𝜃 ) ) ) | |
| 7 | 4 5 6 | syl6c | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ¬ 𝜓 → ( 𝜒 ↔ 𝜃 ) ) ) |
| 8 | 3 7 | pm2.61d | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜒 ↔ 𝜃 ) ) |