This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Lemma used in proofs of implicit substitution properties. The converse requires either a disjoint variable condition ( sbalex ) or a nonfreeness hypothesis ( equs45f ). Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 . See equs4v for a weaker version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2014) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Feb-2018) (New usage is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | equs4 | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑 ) → ∃ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ax6e | ⊢ ∃ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 | |
| 2 | exintr | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑 ) → ( ∃ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ) | |
| 3 | 1 2 | mpi | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑 ) → ∃ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) |