This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Lemma used in proofs of implicit substitution properties. The converse requires either a disjoint variable condition ( sbalex ) or a nonfreeness hypothesis ( equs45f ). Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 . See equs4v for a weaker version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2014) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Feb-2018) (New usage is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | equs4 | |- ( A. x ( x = y -> ph ) -> E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ax6e | |- E. x x = y |
|
| 2 | exintr | |- ( A. x ( x = y -> ph ) -> ( E. x x = y -> E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) ) ) |
|
| 3 | 1 2 | mpi | |- ( A. x ( x = y -> ph ) -> E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) ) |