This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb . By introducing a dummy variable y in the definiens, we are able to eliminate any distinct variable restrictions among the variables t , x , and ph of the definiendum. No distinct variable conflicts arise because y effectively insulates t from x . To achieve this, we use a chain of two substitutions in the form of sb5 , first y for x then t for y . Compare Definition 2.1'' of Quine p. 17, which is obtained from this theorem by applying df-clab . Theorem sb7h provides a version where ph and y don't have to be distinct. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2004) Revise df-sb . (Revised by BJ, 25-Dec-2020) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Sep-2023)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | dfsb7 | ⊢ ( [ 𝑡 / 𝑥 ] 𝜑 ↔ ∃ 𝑦 ( 𝑦 = 𝑡 ∧ ∃ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | sbalex | ⊢ ( ∃ 𝑦 ( 𝑦 = 𝑡 ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑 ) ) ↔ ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝑦 = 𝑡 → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑 ) ) ) | |
| 2 | sbalex | ⊢ ( ∃ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 ) ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑 ) ) | |
| 3 | 2 | anbi2i | ⊢ ( ( 𝑦 = 𝑡 ∧ ∃ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ↔ ( 𝑦 = 𝑡 ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑 ) ) ) |
| 4 | 3 | exbii | ⊢ ( ∃ 𝑦 ( 𝑦 = 𝑡 ∧ ∃ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ↔ ∃ 𝑦 ( 𝑦 = 𝑡 ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑 ) ) ) |
| 5 | dfsb | ⊢ ( [ 𝑡 / 𝑥 ] 𝜑 ↔ ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝑦 = 𝑡 → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑 ) ) ) | |
| 6 | 1 4 5 | 3bitr4ri | ⊢ ( [ 𝑡 / 𝑥 ] 𝜑 ↔ ∃ 𝑦 ( 𝑦 = 𝑡 ∧ ∃ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 ) ) ) |