This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Define the equinumerosity relation. Definition of Enderton p. 129. We define ~ to be a binary relation rather than a connective, so its arguments must be sets to be meaningful. This is acceptable because we do not consider equinumerosity for proper classes. We derive the usual definition as bren . (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | df-en | ⊢ ≈ = { 〈 𝑥 , 𝑦 〉 ∣ ∃ 𝑓 𝑓 : 𝑥 –1-1-onto→ 𝑦 } |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | cen | ⊢ ≈ | |
| 1 | vx | ⊢ 𝑥 | |
| 2 | vy | ⊢ 𝑦 | |
| 3 | vf | ⊢ 𝑓 | |
| 4 | 3 | cv | ⊢ 𝑓 |
| 5 | 1 | cv | ⊢ 𝑥 |
| 6 | 2 | cv | ⊢ 𝑦 |
| 7 | 5 6 4 | wf1o | ⊢ 𝑓 : 𝑥 –1-1-onto→ 𝑦 |
| 8 | 7 3 | wex | ⊢ ∃ 𝑓 𝑓 : 𝑥 –1-1-onto→ 𝑦 |
| 9 | 8 1 2 | copab | ⊢ { 〈 𝑥 , 𝑦 〉 ∣ ∃ 𝑓 𝑓 : 𝑥 –1-1-onto→ 𝑦 } |
| 10 | 0 9 | wceq | ⊢ ≈ = { 〈 𝑥 , 𝑦 〉 ∣ ∃ 𝑓 𝑓 : 𝑥 –1-1-onto→ 𝑦 } |