This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Part of proof of Lemma E in Crawley p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2013)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotheses | cdleme31sc.c | ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ( 𝑠 ∨ 𝑈 ) ∧ ( 𝑄 ∨ ( ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑠 ) ∧ 𝑊 ) ) ) | |
| cdleme31sc.x | ⊢ 𝑋 = ( ( 𝑅 ∨ 𝑈 ) ∧ ( 𝑄 ∨ ( ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑅 ) ∧ 𝑊 ) ) ) | ||
| Assertion | cdleme31sc | ⊢ ( 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 → ⦋ 𝑅 / 𝑠 ⦌ 𝐶 = 𝑋 ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | cdleme31sc.c | ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ( 𝑠 ∨ 𝑈 ) ∧ ( 𝑄 ∨ ( ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑠 ) ∧ 𝑊 ) ) ) | |
| 2 | cdleme31sc.x | ⊢ 𝑋 = ( ( 𝑅 ∨ 𝑈 ) ∧ ( 𝑄 ∨ ( ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑅 ) ∧ 𝑊 ) ) ) | |
| 3 | nfcvd | ⊢ ( 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 → Ⅎ 𝑠 ( ( 𝑅 ∨ 𝑈 ) ∧ ( 𝑄 ∨ ( ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑅 ) ∧ 𝑊 ) ) ) ) | |
| 4 | oveq1 | ⊢ ( 𝑠 = 𝑅 → ( 𝑠 ∨ 𝑈 ) = ( 𝑅 ∨ 𝑈 ) ) | |
| 5 | oveq2 | ⊢ ( 𝑠 = 𝑅 → ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑠 ) = ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑅 ) ) | |
| 6 | 5 | oveq1d | ⊢ ( 𝑠 = 𝑅 → ( ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑠 ) ∧ 𝑊 ) = ( ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑅 ) ∧ 𝑊 ) ) |
| 7 | 6 | oveq2d | ⊢ ( 𝑠 = 𝑅 → ( 𝑄 ∨ ( ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑠 ) ∧ 𝑊 ) ) = ( 𝑄 ∨ ( ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑅 ) ∧ 𝑊 ) ) ) |
| 8 | 4 7 | oveq12d | ⊢ ( 𝑠 = 𝑅 → ( ( 𝑠 ∨ 𝑈 ) ∧ ( 𝑄 ∨ ( ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑠 ) ∧ 𝑊 ) ) ) = ( ( 𝑅 ∨ 𝑈 ) ∧ ( 𝑄 ∨ ( ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑅 ) ∧ 𝑊 ) ) ) ) |
| 9 | 3 8 | csbiegf | ⊢ ( 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 → ⦋ 𝑅 / 𝑠 ⦌ ( ( 𝑠 ∨ 𝑈 ) ∧ ( 𝑄 ∨ ( ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑠 ) ∧ 𝑊 ) ) ) = ( ( 𝑅 ∨ 𝑈 ) ∧ ( 𝑄 ∨ ( ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑅 ) ∧ 𝑊 ) ) ) ) |
| 10 | 1 | csbeq2i | ⊢ ⦋ 𝑅 / 𝑠 ⦌ 𝐶 = ⦋ 𝑅 / 𝑠 ⦌ ( ( 𝑠 ∨ 𝑈 ) ∧ ( 𝑄 ∨ ( ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑠 ) ∧ 𝑊 ) ) ) |
| 11 | 9 10 2 | 3eqtr4g | ⊢ ( 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 → ⦋ 𝑅 / 𝑠 ⦌ 𝐶 = 𝑋 ) |