ac2

Description: Axiom of Choice equivalent. By using restricted quantifiers, we can express the Axiom of Choice with a single explicit conjunction. (If you want to figure it out, the rewritten equivalent ac3 is easier to understand.) Note: aceq0 shows the logical equivalence to ax-ac . (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jul-1996)

		Ref	Expression
	Assertion	ac2	⊢ ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃! 𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢 )

Proof

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-ac	⊢ ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑧 ∀ 𝑤 ( ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ) → ∃ 𝑣 ∀ 𝑢 ( ∃ 𝑡 ( ( 𝑢 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝑢 ∈ 𝑡 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) ↔ 𝑢 = 𝑣 ) )
2		aceq0	⊢ ( ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃! 𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢 ) ↔ ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑧 ∀ 𝑤 ( ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ) → ∃ 𝑣 ∀ 𝑢 ( ∃ 𝑡 ( ( 𝑢 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝑢 ∈ 𝑡 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) ↔ 𝑢 = 𝑣 ) ) )
3	1 2	mpbir	⊢ ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃! 𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢 )

Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem ac2

Proof