This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: A lemma in closed form used to prove bj-cbvex in a weak axiomatization. (Contributed by BJ, 12-Mar-2023) Do not use 19.35 since only the direction of the biconditional used here holds in intuitionistic logic. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | bj-cbveximt |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | bj-exalim | ||
| 2 | 1 | alimi | |
| 3 | bj-alexim | ||
| 4 | 2 3 | syl | |
| 5 | exim | ||
| 6 | imim2 | ||
| 7 | imim1 | ||
| 8 | 5 6 7 | syl56 | |
| 9 | 4 8 | syl6com |