This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: There exists at most one empty set. With either axnul or axnulALT or ax-nul , this proves that there exists a unique empty set. In practice, once the language of classes is available, we use the stronger characterization among classes eq0 . (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2007) Use the at-most-one quantifier. (Revised by BJ, 17-Sep-2022) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-Apr-2023)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | nulmo | |- E* x A. y -. y e. x |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | nfv | |- F/ x F. |
|
| 2 | 1 | axextmo | |- E* x A. y ( y e. x <-> F. ) |
| 3 | nbfal | |- ( -. y e. x <-> ( y e. x <-> F. ) ) |
|
| 4 | 3 | albii | |- ( A. y -. y e. x <-> A. y ( y e. x <-> F. ) ) |
| 5 | 4 | mobii | |- ( E* x A. y -. y e. x <-> E* x A. y ( y e. x <-> F. ) ) |
| 6 | 2 5 | mpbir | |- E* x A. y -. y e. x |