This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Since the converse holds by a1i , this inference shows that we can represent a not-free hypothesis with either F/ x ph (inference form) or ( ph -> F/ x ph ) (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2018) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 10-Jul-2019)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypothesis | nf5di.1 | |- ( ph -> F/ x ph ) |
|
| Assertion | nf5di | |- F/ x ph |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | nf5di.1 | |- ( ph -> F/ x ph ) |
|
| 2 | 1 | nf5rd | |- ( ph -> ( ph -> A. x ph ) ) |
| 3 | 2 | pm2.43i | |- ( ph -> A. x ph ) |
| 4 | 3 | nf5i | |- F/ x ph |