This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Step 18 of Meredith's proof of Lukasiewicz axioms from his sole axiom. (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2002) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | merlem9 | ⊢ ( ( ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) → ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) ) → ( 𝜂 → ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | merlem6 | ⊢ ( ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) → ( ( ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) → ¬ 𝜂 ) → ( ¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜂 ) ) ) | |
| 2 | merlem8 | ⊢ ( ( ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) → ( ( ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) → ¬ 𝜂 ) → ( ¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜂 ) ) ) → ( ( ( ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) → ( ¬ ( ¬ ( ( ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) → ¬ 𝜂 ) → ( ¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜂 ) ) → ¬ 𝜃 ) → ¬ 𝜑 ) ) → ( ¬ ( ( ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) → ¬ 𝜂 ) → ( ¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜂 ) ) → ¬ 𝜃 ) ) → ( ( ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) → ¬ 𝜂 ) → ( ¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜂 ) ) ) ) | |
| 3 | 1 2 | ax-mp | ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) → ( ¬ ( ¬ ( ( ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) → ¬ 𝜂 ) → ( ¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜂 ) ) → ¬ 𝜃 ) → ¬ 𝜑 ) ) → ( ¬ ( ( ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) → ¬ 𝜂 ) → ( ¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜂 ) ) → ¬ 𝜃 ) ) → ( ( ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) → ¬ 𝜂 ) → ( ¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜂 ) ) ) |
| 4 | meredith | ⊢ ( ( ( ( ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) → ( ¬ ( ¬ ( ( ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) → ¬ 𝜂 ) → ( ¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜂 ) ) → ¬ 𝜃 ) → ¬ 𝜑 ) ) → ( ¬ ( ( ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) → ¬ 𝜂 ) → ( ¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜂 ) ) → ¬ 𝜃 ) ) → ( ( ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) → ¬ 𝜂 ) → ( ¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜂 ) ) ) → ( ( ( ( ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) → ¬ 𝜂 ) → ( ¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜂 ) ) → 𝜓 ) → ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ) ) | |
| 5 | 3 4 | ax-mp | ⊢ ( ( ( ( ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) → ¬ 𝜂 ) → ( ¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜂 ) ) → 𝜓 ) → ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ) |
| 6 | meredith | ⊢ ( ( ( ( ( ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) → ¬ 𝜂 ) → ( ¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜂 ) ) → 𝜓 ) → ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ) → ( ( ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) → ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) ) → ( 𝜂 → ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) ) ) ) | |
| 7 | 5 6 | ax-mp | ⊢ ( ( ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) → ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) ) → ( 𝜂 → ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜏 ) ) ) ) ) |