This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: The virtual deduction form of a 2-antecedent nested implication implies the 2-antecedent nested implication. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2011) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | dfvd2imp | ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) → ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜒 ) ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | dfvd2 | ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) ↔ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜒 ) ) ) | |
| 2 | 1 | biimpi | ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) → ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜒 ) ) ) |