This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Given falsum F. , we can define the negation of a wff ph as the statement that F. follows from assuming ph . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Jul-2019)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | dfnot | ⊢ ( ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ( 𝜑 → ⊥ ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | fal | ⊢ ¬ ⊥ | |
| 2 | mtt | ⊢ ( ¬ ⊥ → ( ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ( 𝜑 → ⊥ ) ) ) | |
| 3 | 1 2 | ax-mp | ⊢ ( ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ( 𝜑 → ⊥ ) ) |