This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 . This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011) (New usage is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotheses | bnj544.1 | ⊢ ( 𝜑′ ↔ ( 𝑓 ‘ ∅ ) = pred ( 𝑥 , 𝐴 , 𝑅 ) ) | |
| bnj544.2 | ⊢ ( 𝜓′ ↔ ∀ 𝑖 ∈ ω ( suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚 → ( 𝑓 ‘ suc 𝑖 ) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑖 ) pred ( 𝑦 , 𝐴 , 𝑅 ) ) ) | ||
| bnj544.3 | ⊢ 𝐷 = ( ω ∖ { ∅ } ) | ||
| bnj544.4 | ⊢ 𝐺 = ( 𝑓 ∪ { 〈 𝑚 , ∪ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑝 ) pred ( 𝑦 , 𝐴 , 𝑅 ) 〉 } ) | ||
| bnj544.5 | ⊢ ( 𝜏 ↔ ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑚 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′ ) ) | ||
| bnj544.6 | ⊢ ( 𝜎 ↔ ( 𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚 ) ) | ||
| Assertion | bnj544 | ⊢ ( ( 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎 ) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛 ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | bnj544.1 | ⊢ ( 𝜑′ ↔ ( 𝑓 ‘ ∅ ) = pred ( 𝑥 , 𝐴 , 𝑅 ) ) | |
| 2 | bnj544.2 | ⊢ ( 𝜓′ ↔ ∀ 𝑖 ∈ ω ( suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚 → ( 𝑓 ‘ suc 𝑖 ) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑖 ) pred ( 𝑦 , 𝐴 , 𝑅 ) ) ) | |
| 3 | bnj544.3 | ⊢ 𝐷 = ( ω ∖ { ∅ } ) | |
| 4 | bnj544.4 | ⊢ 𝐺 = ( 𝑓 ∪ { 〈 𝑚 , ∪ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑝 ) pred ( 𝑦 , 𝐴 , 𝑅 ) 〉 } ) | |
| 5 | bnj544.5 | ⊢ ( 𝜏 ↔ ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑚 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′ ) ) | |
| 6 | bnj544.6 | ⊢ ( 𝜎 ↔ ( 𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚 ) ) | |
| 7 | 3 | bnj923 | ⊢ ( 𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝑚 ∈ ω ) |
| 8 | 7 | 3anim1i | ⊢ ( ( 𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚 ) → ( 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚 ) ) |
| 9 | 6 8 | sylbi | ⊢ ( 𝜎 → ( 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚 ) ) |
| 10 | biid | ⊢ ( ( 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚 ) ↔ ( 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚 ) ) | |
| 11 | 1 2 4 5 10 | bnj543 | ⊢ ( ( 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ ( 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚 ) ) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛 ) |
| 12 | 9 11 | syl3an3 | ⊢ ( ( 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎 ) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛 ) |