This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Well-founded recursion, part 2 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf . (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011) (New usage is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotheses | bnj1500.1 | ⊢ 𝐵 = { 𝑑 ∣ ( 𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred ( 𝑥 , 𝐴 , 𝑅 ) ⊆ 𝑑 ) } | |
| bnj1500.2 | ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈 𝑥 , ( 𝑓 ↾ pred ( 𝑥 , 𝐴 , 𝑅 ) ) 〉 | ||
| bnj1500.3 | ⊢ 𝐶 = { 𝑓 ∣ ∃ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑥 ) = ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑌 ) ) } | ||
| bnj1500.4 | ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶 | ||
| Assertion | bnj1500 | ⊢ ( 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) = ( 𝐺 ‘ 〈 𝑥 , ( 𝐹 ↾ pred ( 𝑥 , 𝐴 , 𝑅 ) ) 〉 ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | bnj1500.1 | ⊢ 𝐵 = { 𝑑 ∣ ( 𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred ( 𝑥 , 𝐴 , 𝑅 ) ⊆ 𝑑 ) } | |
| 2 | bnj1500.2 | ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈 𝑥 , ( 𝑓 ↾ pred ( 𝑥 , 𝐴 , 𝑅 ) ) 〉 | |
| 3 | bnj1500.3 | ⊢ 𝐶 = { 𝑓 ∣ ∃ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑥 ) = ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑌 ) ) } | |
| 4 | bnj1500.4 | ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶 | |
| 5 | biid | ⊢ ( ( 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ) ↔ ( 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ) ) | |
| 6 | biid | ⊢ ( ( ( 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ) ↔ ( ( 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ) ) | |
| 7 | biid | ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ) ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ dom 𝑓 = 𝑑 ) ↔ ( ( ( 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ) ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ dom 𝑓 = 𝑑 ) ) | |
| 8 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | bnj1501 | ⊢ ( 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) = ( 𝐺 ‘ 〈 𝑥 , ( 𝐹 ↾ pred ( 𝑥 , 𝐴 , 𝑅 ) ) 〉 ) ) |