This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: New nonfreeness implies old nonfreeness on minimal implicational calculus (the proof indicates it uses ax-3 because of set.mm's definition of the biconditional, but the proof actually holds in minimal implicational calculus). (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023) The proof should not rely on df-nf except via df-nf directly. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | bj-nnfnfTEMP | ⊢ ( Ⅎ' 𝑥 𝜑 → Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜑 ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | bj-nnfea | ⊢ ( Ⅎ' 𝑥 𝜑 → ( ∃ 𝑥 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ) ) | |
| 2 | df-nf | ⊢ ( Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜑 ↔ ( ∃ 𝑥 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ) ) | |
| 3 | 1 2 | sylibr | ⊢ ( Ⅎ' 𝑥 𝜑 → Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜑 ) |