This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: One of four lemmas for nonfreeness: antecedent expressed with existential quantifier and consequent expressed with universal quantifier. (Contributed by BJ, 12-Aug-2023) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | bj-nnflemea | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → 𝜑 ) → ( ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | bj-19.12 | ⊢ ( ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 ) | |
| 2 | alim | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → 𝜑 ) → ( ∀ 𝑥 ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ) ) | |
| 3 | 1 2 | syl5 | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → 𝜑 ) → ( ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ) ) |