This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.

Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem 3noncolr1N

Description: Two ways to express 3 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 1 place). (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2012) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses 3noncol.l ⊢ ≤ = ( le ‘ 𝐾 )
3noncol.j ⊢ ∨ = ( join ‘ 𝐾 )
3noncol.a ⊢ 𝐴 = ( Atoms ‘ 𝐾 )
Assertion 3noncolr1N ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ( 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 ) ) ) → ( 𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ ( 𝑅 ∨ 𝑃 ) ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 3noncol.l ⊢ ≤ = ( le ‘ 𝐾 )
2 3noncol.j ⊢ ∨ = ( join ‘ 𝐾 )
3 3noncol.a ⊢ 𝐴 = ( Atoms ‘ 𝐾 )
4 simp1 ⊢ ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ( 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 ) ) ) → 𝐾 ∈ HL )
5 simp22 ⊢ ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ( 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 ) ) ) → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 )
6 simp23 ⊢ ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ( 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 ) ) ) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 )
7 simp21 ⊢ ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ( 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 ) ) ) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 )
8 1 2 3 3noncolr2 ⊢ ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ( 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 ) ) ) → ( 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ( 𝑄 ∨ 𝑅 ) ) )
9 1 2 3 3noncolr2 ⊢ ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ( 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ( 𝑄 ∨ 𝑅 ) ) ) → ( 𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ ( 𝑅 ∨ 𝑃 ) ) )
10 4 5 6 7 8 9 syl131anc ⊢ ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ( 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 ) ) ) → ( 𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ ( 𝑅 ∨ 𝑃 ) ) )