This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: An equivalence related to implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 . See equsexvw and equsexv for versions with disjoint variable conditions proved from fewer axioms. See also the dual form equsal . See equsexALT for an alternate proof. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Feb-2018) (New usage is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotheses | equsal.1 | ||
| equsal.2 | |||
| Assertion | equsex |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | equsal.1 | ||
| 2 | equsal.2 | ||
| 3 | 2 | biimpa | |
| 4 | 1 3 | exlimi | |
| 5 | 1 2 | equsal | |
| 6 | equs4 | ||
| 7 | 5 6 | sylbir | |
| 8 | 4 7 | impbii |