This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Simplify an implication between two implications when the antecedent of the first is a consequence of the antecedent of the second. The reverse form is useful in producing the successor step in induction proofs. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Sep-2013)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | imim21b | |- ( ( ps -> ph ) -> ( ( ( ph -> ch ) -> ( ps -> th ) ) <-> ( ps -> ( ch -> th ) ) ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | bi2.04 | |- ( ( ( ph -> ch ) -> ( ps -> th ) ) <-> ( ps -> ( ( ph -> ch ) -> th ) ) ) |
|
| 2 | pm5.5 | |- ( ph -> ( ( ph -> ch ) <-> ch ) ) |
|
| 3 | 2 | imbi1d | |- ( ph -> ( ( ( ph -> ch ) -> th ) <-> ( ch -> th ) ) ) |
| 4 | 3 | imim2i | |- ( ( ps -> ph ) -> ( ps -> ( ( ( ph -> ch ) -> th ) <-> ( ch -> th ) ) ) ) |
| 5 | 4 | pm5.74d | |- ( ( ps -> ph ) -> ( ( ps -> ( ( ph -> ch ) -> th ) ) <-> ( ps -> ( ch -> th ) ) ) ) |
| 6 | 1 5 | bitrid | |- ( ( ps -> ph ) -> ( ( ( ph -> ch ) -> ( ps -> th ) ) <-> ( ps -> ( ch -> th ) ) ) ) |