This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Part of proof of Lemma E in Crawley p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 26-Feb-2013)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotheses | cdleme31sn.n | |- N = if ( s .<_ ( P .\/ Q ) , I , D ) |
|
| cdleme31sn.c | |- C = if ( R .<_ ( P .\/ Q ) , [_ R / s ]_ I , [_ R / s ]_ D ) |
||
| Assertion | cdleme31sn | |- ( R e. A -> [_ R / s ]_ N = C ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | cdleme31sn.n | |- N = if ( s .<_ ( P .\/ Q ) , I , D ) |
|
| 2 | cdleme31sn.c | |- C = if ( R .<_ ( P .\/ Q ) , [_ R / s ]_ I , [_ R / s ]_ D ) |
|
| 3 | nfv | |- F/ s R .<_ ( P .\/ Q ) |
|
| 4 | nfcsb1v | |- F/_ s [_ R / s ]_ I |
|
| 5 | nfcsb1v | |- F/_ s [_ R / s ]_ D |
|
| 6 | 3 4 5 | nfif | |- F/_ s if ( R .<_ ( P .\/ Q ) , [_ R / s ]_ I , [_ R / s ]_ D ) |
| 7 | 6 | a1i | |- ( R e. A -> F/_ s if ( R .<_ ( P .\/ Q ) , [_ R / s ]_ I , [_ R / s ]_ D ) ) |
| 8 | breq1 | |- ( s = R -> ( s .<_ ( P .\/ Q ) <-> R .<_ ( P .\/ Q ) ) ) |
|
| 9 | csbeq1a | |- ( s = R -> I = [_ R / s ]_ I ) |
|
| 10 | csbeq1a | |- ( s = R -> D = [_ R / s ]_ D ) |
|
| 11 | 8 9 10 | ifbieq12d | |- ( s = R -> if ( s .<_ ( P .\/ Q ) , I , D ) = if ( R .<_ ( P .\/ Q ) , [_ R / s ]_ I , [_ R / s ]_ D ) ) |
| 12 | 7 11 | csbiegf | |- ( R e. A -> [_ R / s ]_ if ( s .<_ ( P .\/ Q ) , I , D ) = if ( R .<_ ( P .\/ Q ) , [_ R / s ]_ I , [_ R / s ]_ D ) ) |
| 13 | 1 | csbeq2i | |- [_ R / s ]_ N = [_ R / s ]_ if ( s .<_ ( P .\/ Q ) , I , D ) |
| 14 | 12 13 2 | 3eqtr4g | |- ( R e. A -> [_ R / s ]_ N = C ) |