This is an inofficial mirror of http://metamath.tirix.org for personal testing of a visualizer extension only.
Description: Part of proof of Lemma E in Crawley p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2013)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotheses | cdleme31.o | |- O = ( iota_ z e. B A. s e. A ( ( -. s .<_ W /\ ( s .\/ ( x ./\ W ) ) = x ) -> z = ( N .\/ ( x ./\ W ) ) ) ) |
|
| cdleme31.f | |- F = ( x e. B |-> if ( ( P =/= Q /\ -. x .<_ W ) , O , x ) ) |
||
| Assertion | cdleme31fv1s | |- ( ( X e. B /\ ( P =/= Q /\ -. X .<_ W ) ) -> ( F ` X ) = [_ X / x ]_ O ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | cdleme31.o | |- O = ( iota_ z e. B A. s e. A ( ( -. s .<_ W /\ ( s .\/ ( x ./\ W ) ) = x ) -> z = ( N .\/ ( x ./\ W ) ) ) ) |
|
| 2 | cdleme31.f | |- F = ( x e. B |-> if ( ( P =/= Q /\ -. x .<_ W ) , O , x ) ) |
|
| 3 | eqid | |- ( iota_ z e. B A. s e. A ( ( -. s .<_ W /\ ( s .\/ ( X ./\ W ) ) = X ) -> z = ( N .\/ ( X ./\ W ) ) ) ) = ( iota_ z e. B A. s e. A ( ( -. s .<_ W /\ ( s .\/ ( X ./\ W ) ) = X ) -> z = ( N .\/ ( X ./\ W ) ) ) ) |
|
| 4 | 1 2 3 | cdleme31fv1 | |- ( ( X e. B /\ ( P =/= Q /\ -. X .<_ W ) ) -> ( F ` X ) = ( iota_ z e. B A. s e. A ( ( -. s .<_ W /\ ( s .\/ ( X ./\ W ) ) = X ) -> z = ( N .\/ ( X ./\ W ) ) ) ) ) |
| 5 | 1 3 | cdleme31so | |- ( X e. B -> [_ X / x ]_ O = ( iota_ z e. B A. s e. A ( ( -. s .<_ W /\ ( s .\/ ( X ./\ W ) ) = X ) -> z = ( N .\/ ( X ./\ W ) ) ) ) ) |
| 6 | 5 | adantr | |- ( ( X e. B /\ ( P =/= Q /\ -. X .<_ W ) ) -> [_ X / x ]_ O = ( iota_ z e. B A. s e. A ( ( -. s .<_ W /\ ( s .\/ ( X ./\ W ) ) = X ) -> z = ( N .\/ ( X ./\ W ) ) ) ) ) |
| 7 | 4 6 | eqtr4d | |- ( ( X e. B /\ ( P =/= Q /\ -. X .<_ W ) ) -> ( F ` X ) = [_ X / x ]_ O ) |